中外智庫評價(jià)研究與排名

摘要： 伴隨智庫建設(shè)熱的興起,智庫評價(jià)和排名成為智庫研究領(lǐng)域的熱點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn)問題。國外學(xué)者先行對智庫評價(jià)研究,從不同角度探索和評價(jià)智庫的影響力、功能的發(fā)揮和背后的制度差異;中國學(xué)者主要開展智庫影響力評價(jià)和綜合評價(jià)。相較于智庫評價(jià)研究,中國對智庫評價(jià)排名比國外更活躍,眾多學(xué)者和機(jī)構(gòu)開展了智庫評價(jià)和排名。未來國內(nèi)智庫評價(jià)和排名實(shí)踐競爭將日趨激烈;基于公共數(shù)據(jù)平臺(tái)和大數(shù)據(jù)庫,評價(jià)方法將實(shí)現(xiàn)定性和定量相結(jié)合等多元評價(jià)方法,評價(jià)結(jié)果更具科學(xué)性和客觀性;評價(jià)對象會(huì)進(jìn)一步細(xì)分,維度和指標(biāo)體系更具本土化,并充分發(fā)揮智庫評價(jià)對于智庫建設(shè)的導(dǎo)向作用。
With the rise of the construction of think tanks,the evaluation and ranking of think tanks have become a hot topic and a difficult issue.Foreign scholars,who firstly researched on think tanks,studied and evaluated the influence,function and institutional difference of think tanks from different angles.Chinese scholars mainly carried out the influence evaluation and comprehensive evaluation of think tanks.Compared with the evaluation research of think tanks,domestic think tanks ranking is more active than that at abroad.Many scholars and institutions have implemented the evaluation and ranking of think tanks.The competition of domestic think tanks evaluation and ranking practice will be increasingly fierce in the future.Based on the public data platform and big data,the evaluation method will realize the combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis,and the evaluation results will be more scientific and objective.The evaluation object will be further subdivided,and the dimension and index system will be more localized,which will fully play the guiding role of think tanks evaluation on the construction of think tanks.